Proposes a reporting framework to reduce confusion from imaging-based diagnoses in asymptomatic patients, suggesting better communication and care.
Variable interpretation of venous findings on imaging can contribute to referrer and patient confusion. Pelvic venous findings, specifically, are commonly encountered in asymptomatic patients. Diagnoses based on such imaging findings alone (e.g., diagnoses of nutcracker syndrome, May-Thurner syndrome, or pelvic congestion syndrome based on anatomic findings) can result in unnecessary testing and intervention. A shift away from imaging-based diagnoses and syndromic labels to a descriptive reporting framework may reduce this unnecessary care and improve communication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hesh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: