A critical commentary on CrossFit Research® with coach insights on training monitoring and physical assessment

BACKGROUND: research and to highlight the importance of contextualizing scientific inquiry through the perspectives of coaches actively working within the sport. METHODS: coaches. Analysis of coach responses was used to contextualize gaps in the literature. RESULTS: Coaches reported relying primarily on competition results, training observations, and subjective feedback to guide programming, rather than standardized physical testing or technology-based monitoring. The remote nature of many coach-athlete relationships further complicates data collection and training analysis. CONCLUSIONS: research must improve its methodological rigor by adopting sport-specific assessments, clearly defining participant characteristics, and embracing the realities of coaching practice. Integrating qualitative insights and prioritizing ecological validity will help bridge the gap between science and the sport's unique demands.