Develops a quality of life tool for patients with relapsing polychondritis, suggesting improved assessment methods.
OBJECTIVES: Relapsing polychondritis (RP) is a rare, multisystem inflammatory disease characterized by heterogeneous clinical manifestations and a substantial impact on patients' daily functioning and well-being. Health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in RP remains insufficiently characterized, and no disease-specific measurement tool is available so far. This study aimed to develop and validate the RP-QoL, a multilingual, patient-reported outcome instrument specifically designed to assess HR-QoL in individuals with RP. METHODS: The RP-QoL was developed within the European Reference Network ReCONNET using a structured four-step approach: (1) identification of relevant HR-QoL domains through systematic literature review, an international patient survey, and expert consensus; (2) item generation; (3) pilot testing including cognitive debriefing; and (4) comprehensive psychometric validation. Validation analyses included assessment of internal consistency, structural validity, construct validity, convergent validity with the SF-36, and criterion-related validity. RESULTS: Domain identification incorporated input from 274 patients across 22 countries, leading to a 31-item pilot questionnaire with a 28-day recall period and 5-point response scale. Cognitive debriefing confirmed clarity, relevance, and feasibility. Validation in 239 patients from 19 countries (median age 55 years; 80% female) demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.96). Exploratory factor analysis supported near-unidimensionality, with the first factor explaining 46.6% of variance. RP-QoL scores correlated strongly with disease impact (ρ = -0.62, p< 0.0001) and SF-36 physical (ρ = 0.65) and mental (ρ = 0.55, p< 0.0001) components (both p< 0.0001, p< 0.0001). Discriminative ability was high (AUC = 0.87). CONCLUSION: The RP-QoL is the first validated, disease-specific HR-QoL instrument for RP, with robust psychometric performance and applicability in both clinical practice and research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arnaud et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: