Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study investigates dietary knowledge's association with Mediterranean diet adherence in adults with type 2 diabetes, suggesting limited influence.
Objectives To investigate the association between dietary knowledge and adherence to Mediterranean diet (MedD) among people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Israel. Methods In this cross-sectional single-center study, adults with T2D visiting a diabetes clinic were enrolled for an interviewer-administered survey. Dietary knowledge was assessed using a questionnaire adapted for locally available foods. MedD adherence was measured using the Israeli Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (I-MEDAS). Additional clinical and anthropometric characteristics were retrieved from patients’ medical records. The association between dietary knowledge and MedD adherence was analyzed in a multivariable logistic model. ResultsF A total of 134 people were included. Mean age was 70 ± 10.7 years; 54.5% were women. The mean dietary knowledge score was 12.1 ± 2.4 (range: 0–17), and the MedD adherence score was 11.0 ± 2.1 (range: 0–17). In multivariable analysis, adjusted for age, sex, socio-economic status and diabetes duration, people in the highest tertile of dietary knowledge were more likely to be in the highest tertile of MedD adherence (adjusted odds ratio 4.6, 95% CI 1.5–14.8, p = 0.01), compared to those in the lowest knowledge tertile. The model explained limited variance in adherence (Nagelkerke R² = 0.16). Sensitivity analyses using the exposure and outcome variables as continuous scores were not statistically significant. Conclusion Dietary knowledge showed a modest association with MedD adherence in Israeli adults with type 2 diabetes, but this association lacked robustness across analytical approaches. Dietary knowledge explains a small proportion of dietary adherence variability, suggesting that unmeasured factors play a more substantial role in determining dietary behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meron et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: