Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review analyzes screen printing techniques for reducing silver in silicon photovoltaics, highlighting sustainability challenges and innovations.
Screen printing has been the dominant metallization technology for silicon solar cells since the 1980s. Within two decades, printed finger widths were reduced from ∼100 μm to ∼10–15 μm in mass production and ∼5 μm at R&D level. This review analyzes the economic drivers, technological catalysts, and milestones that have shaped screen-printed solar cell metallization. We first examine the proposed goal of < 2 mg/Wp silver consumption for sustainable terawatt-scale PV production by calculating various scenarios with updated assumptions. We derive a two-phase learning curve for finger width vs cumulative PV capacity, with learning rates of 12% (2008–2012) and 29% (2013–2024). We show how silver price volatility (peaks in 2008 and 2011) and interconnection transitions from three busbars to multi-busbar/multi-wire concepts catalyzed rapid fine-line innovations, reducing silver consumption while increasing cell performance. We discuss disruptive innovations such as knotless fine-mesh screens, laser-structured polyimide screens, and laser-enhanced contact optimization and their impact on fine-line printing. We quantify the learning rate of silver's module-price share, finding a 21.7% reduction per capacity doubling. However, silver's module-price share has risen since 2024 due to growing market share of TOPCon and rising silver prices. Finally, we outline pathways toward sustainable low-silver PV metallization, including stencil printing as an alternative to screen printing and the growing role of copper-, nickel-, or aluminum-containing pastes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lorenz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: