Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized mapping reveals fermion-like behavior in bosons via imaginary chemical potentials, suggesting new thermodynamic insights.
A formal thermodynamic mapping is established between the attractive Fermi–Hubbard model and the repulsive Bose–Hubbard model at finite temperature and at imaginary chemical potential μ=iθ. By utilizing a large N-expansion, it is shown that the partition functions of the two models are related by a plain shift θ→θ+π. This condition maps the BCS–BEC crossover of attractive fermions to a Bose–Fermi crossover (fermion-like occupation) of repulsive bosons. A central feature of this correspondence is the thermal kernel g(βE,ϕ) (with β the inverse absolute temperature, E the energy scale, and ϕ the phase angle), whose analytic continuation gB(βE,ϕ)=gF(βE,ϕ+π) governs the bosonic (B) and fermionic (F) sectors. Interestingly, the particular angles ϕ=2π/3 and 4π/3 for fermions correspond to ϕ=π/3 and 5π/3 for bosons, marking the boundaries of an universal thermal window. It is further argued that the present mechanism shows how an emergent, fermionization-like phenomenon can occur at finite interaction strength through a thermodynamic effect induced by the imaginary chemical potential. It is emphasized that this does not imply a transmutation of quantum statistics at the operator level, but rather a thermodynamic exclusion-like behavior driven by the imaginary chemical potential, unlike the Tonks–Girardeau limit, where fermionization arises from an infinite repulsive interaction and anyonic or Floquet-engineered systems where transmutation emerges from modified statistics or dynamics. Effectively, the phase ϕ is a statistical parameter; by twisting the thermal phase, it generates fermion-like behavior without hard-core constraints or infinite repulsion through purely thermodynamic mechanisms. The gap equation and number equation for the bosonic model are derived, highlighting the role of the imaginary chemical potential as a statistical regulator. The results obtained here provide a unified framework for understanding crossovers in interacting lattice systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Evangelos G. Filothodoros (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: