Key result
Highest TyG index tertile linked to ~58% higher risk of aortic stenosis progression.
Why the study?
Insulin resistance may contribute to aortic stenosis valvular degeneration, but the prognostic value of non-insulin-based insulin resistance indices remains uncertain.
Do high non-insulin-based insulin resistance indices predict aortic stenosis progression in patients with mild or moderate aortic stenosis?
Cohort (n=2,220)
Do high non-insulin-based insulin resistance indices predict aortic stenosis progression in patients with mild or moderate aortic stenosis?
Hazard Ratio: 1.58 (95% CI 1.2–2.07)
Non-insulin-based insulin resistance indices, particularly TyG and AIP, are independently associated with the progression of mild-to-moderate aortic stenosis and may help guide echocardiographic surveillance.
TyG-related IR indices were associated with AS progression; hypothesis-generating for risk stratification and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common progressive valvular disease with no approved medical therapy to slow progression. Insulin resistance may contribute to valvular degeneration, but the prognostic value of non-insulin-based insulin resistance (IR) indices remains uncertain. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 2,220 patients with mild-to-moderate AS from the WenZhou Valve Heart Disease registry. Four IR surrogates were assessed: triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, TyG-BMI, atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), and metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR). AS progression was defined as an annual increase in peak aortic jet velocity (ΔVmax/year) ≥0.3 m/s/year. Associations and predictive performance were evaluated using multivariable Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, restricted cubic splines, ROC curves, and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 3.03 years, 414 patients (18.6%) developed AS progression. After multivariable adjustment, the highest tertiles of TyG, AIP, and TyG-BMI were independently associated with higher progression risk, with HRs of 1.58 (95% CI: 1.20-2.07), 1.43 (95% CI: 1.10-1.85), and 1.52 (95% CI: 1.18-1.95), respectively. TyG showed the strongest standalone discrimination (AUC 0.638), outperforming AIP and METS-IR. Associations were stronger in hypertensive patients. Adding IR indices modestly improved discrimination and reclassification, especially for TyG-BMI. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness. CONCLUSION: TyG and AIP were independently associated with non-severe AS progression, while TyG-BMI improved risk classification. These routine metabolic markers may help guide closer echocardiographic surveillance and metabolic risk management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ni et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Mild or moderate aortic stenosis (n=2,220). High non-insulin-based insulin resistance indices (TyG, AIP, TyG-BMI) vs. Lower tertiles of insulin resistance indices was evaluated on Aortic stenosis progression (annual increase in peak aortic jet velocity ≥0.3 m/s/year) (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.20-2.07). The highest tertile of the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index was independently associated with a higher risk of aortic stenosis progression (HR 1.58; 95% CI 1.20-2.07).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: