Why the study?
Does a dilated U-Net architecture improve carotid plaque segmentation accuracy in ultrasound images of severely stenotic carotid plaque patients compared to a standard U-Net?
Does a dilated U-Net architecture improve carotid plaque segmentation accuracy in ultrasound images of severely stenotic carotid plaque patients compared to a standard U-Net?
A semi-automatic deep learning approach using a bounding box significantly improves carotid plaque segmentation accuracy in ultrasound images compared to fully automatic methods.
May support automated carotid plaque analysis in research; leaves open prospective clinical validation before any workflow adoption.
Carotid plaque segmentation in ultrasound longitudinal B-mode images using deep learning is presented in this work. We report on 101 severely stenotic carotid plaque patients. A standard U-Net is compared with a dilated U-Net architecture in which the dilated convolution layers were used in the bottleneck. Both a fully automatic and a semi-automatic approach with a bounding box was implemented. The performance degradation in plaque segmentation due to errors in the bounding box is quantified. We found that the bounding box significantly improved the performance of the networks with U-Net Dice coefficients of 0.48 for automatic and 0.83 for semi-automatic segmentation of plaque. Similar results were also obtained for the dilated U-Net with Dice coefficients of 0.55 for automatic and 0.84 for semi-automatic when compared to manual segmentations of the same plaque by an experienced sonographer. A 5% error in the bounding box in both dimensions reduced the Dice coefficient to 0.79 and 0.80 for U-Net and dilated U-Net respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meshram et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: