Analysis describes how MPs use political trust in debates, highlighting strategic purposes over substantive concerns.
Although political trust is commonly understood as a relation between subject (truster) and object (trustee), research almost exclusively focuses on citizens. The inherent agency of politicians has been overlooked. This article sets three aims: (1) to develop a codebook to analyse trust in texts and speeches by politicians, (2) to describe the use of political trust in parliamentary debates, and (3) to understand how MPs employ political trust in these debates. It studies annual state-of-the-nation debates in four European (high-trust and low-trust; majoritarian and proportional) democracies between 1998 and 2018. Generally, political trust receives little attention in these debates. Over time, politicians’ attention for political trust coincides with economic hardship and rising radical-right populism. Moreover, politicians discuss trust predominantly for strategic purposes (discrediting others; praising themselves), rather than as a substantive concern. This may contribute to a politicisation of political distrust that may harm legitimacy in the long run.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steenvoorden et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: