Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved permeability evaluation in shaly sandstone reservoirs, indicating better model accuracy.
Permeability evaluation in deeply buried overpressured shaly sandstone gas reservoirs remains challenging because permeability is controlled not only by pore volume but also by pore-throat architecture, connectivity, and heterogeneity. In addition, differences between laboratory nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements and downhole NMR logging introduce echo-spacing dependence into transverse relaxation time ( T 2 ) distributions and derived descriptors, limiting the direct transfer of laboratory-calibrated permeability models to logging applications. To address this issue, we propose a pore-type-aware and echo-spacing-consistent NMR workflow for permeability evaluation in overpressured shaly sandstone gas reservoirs. Samples were first classified into three pore-system types using independent descriptors reflecting pore-structure characteristics, and the echo-spacing dependence of key NMR parameters was then examined under multiple acquisition conditions. The results show that, relative to the 0.2 ms reference condition, increasing echo spacing ( T E ) up to 1.2 ms progressively attenuates short- T 2 components, leading to underestimation of NMR porosity and systematic shifts in the geometric mean transverse relaxation time ( T 2GM ) and the fractal dimension ( D f ). Both the T 2GM and the D f derived from the T 2 distribution decrease monotonically with increasing echo spacing; this decrease is weakest in large-pore-dominated samples but strongest in micropore- and clay-rich samples. The corrected T 2GM and D f were then incorporated into a pore-type-specific modified Schlumberger-Doll Research (SDR) permeability model. Compared with the conventional SDR model, the proposed model improves internal predictive consistency and practical laboratory-to-log transferability within the present reservoir-specific calibration data set, with the most pronounced improvement observed in tight and structurally complex pore types. A field NMR log example further illustrates improved consistency between laboratory calibration and logging interpretation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: