Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial assesses taVNS for sedation in bidirectional endoscopy, suggesting opioid alternatives.
BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) provides targeted modulation of the autonomic nervous system and descending pain pathways, exerting analgesic potential. However, high-quality evidence remains insufficient to determine whether taVNS can effectively replace opioids in sedation regimens for same-session bidirectional endoscopy while maintaining the quality of early postoperative recovery. DISCUSSION: This study is a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-arm non-inferiority trial. A total of 181 patients scheduled for painless same-session bidirectional endoscopy will be enrolled and randomly assigned using dynamic block randomization to one of three groups: Group S (sufentanil 0.1 µg/kg plus sham taVNS), Group T (normal saline plus active taVNS), and Group P (normal saline plus sham taVNS). All participants will receive ciprofol for sedation induction and maintenance. The primary outcome will be the quality of recovery at 24 h postoperatively, assessed using the 15-item Quality of Recovery scale (QoR-15), with a predefined non-inferiority margin (δ) of 6 points, which corresponds to the minimal clinically important difference of the QoR-15 scale. Secondary outcomes will include perioperative adverse events (pre-, intra-, and postoperative, including taVNS-related events), QoR-15 score at 1 h postoperatively, procedural and recovery efficiency indices, sedative dosage, and patient and endoscopist satisfaction scores. Blinding effectiveness will be assessed in all participants, and statistical analyses will follow the modified intention-to-treat principle. CONCLUSION: This study protocol will rigorously assess the effectiveness and safety of taVNS as an alternative to opioid analgesics for sedation during same-session bidirectional endoscopy using, to our knowledge, the first three-arm design.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2600117962).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: