Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows enhanced combustion performance and electrostatic safety in GATo propellants with composite catalysts, implying improved safety measures.
In an effort to address the inherent trade-off between electrostatic safety and combustion performance in solid propellants, a series of CuCr₂O₄/polypyrrole (PPy) composite catalysts with tunable microstructures was designed in this study. CuCr₂O₄/PPy composite catalysts with CuCr₂O₄ loadings of 10, 30, and 50 wt% were synthesized via the hydrothermal method and in-situ polymerization. The microstructural evolution was characterized by electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and N₂ physisorption. These composites were incorporated at 2 wt% into GATo propellants, a Composite Modified Double-Base (CMDB) propellant, and their effects on electrical resistivity, thermal decomposition, burning rate, and sensitivities were systematically evaluated. The specific surface area of the composites decreased progressively from 52.7 m²/g (10 wt% CuCr₂O₄, 1#) to 38.1 m²/g (50 wt% CuCr₂O₄, 3#), confirming a microstructural transition from a continuous PPy network to agglomerated CuCr₂O₄ particles. The composite with low CuCr₂O₄ loading (10 wt%) imparted the lowest electrical resistivity and the most significant safety enhancement, while slightly improving the combustion performance of the GATo propellant: the negative electrostatic sensitivity threshold increased by 38% (from 1.78 J to 2.45 J), and the impact sensitivity threshold improved by 150% (from 4.0 J to 10.0 J). In contrast, the composite with high CuCr₂O₄ loading (50 wt%) achieved the highest combustion performance while reducing the sensitivity of the GATo propellant: the burning rate increased by 44% (from 3.79 to 5.47 mm/s), and the exothermic peak temperature decreased by 5.3°C.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: