Cross-sectional study finds higher ultra-processed food intake linked to increased depression risk in older adults, suggesting dietary impacts.
Background: This investigation aimed to evaluate the relationship between ultra-processed foods (UPFs) intake and indicators of depression and quality of life (QoL) in community-dwelling older adults.Methods: In this community-based cross-sectional study, 368 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 67.11 ± 6.21 years; 55.2% women) were recruited from local health centers. Body composition was measured using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer and physical activity was evaluated with a validated short-form questionnaire. Dietary intake was captured through a self-administered 147-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire, with UPFs classified according to the NOVA system and categorized into tertiles.Results: A clear, stepwise increase in depression prevalence was observed across ascending tertiles of UPFs intake (P < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, higher UPFs intake remained significantly associated with greater odds of depression in the overall population (T2 vs. T1: OR = 2.13; 95% CI, 1.43–3.17; P < 0.001 and T3 vs. T1: OR = 1.50; 95% CI, 1.01–2.22; P = 0.041). Sex-stratified analyses revealed that these associations were significant among women (T2 vs. T1: OR = 3.27; 95% CI, 1.85–5.77; P < 0.001 and T3 vs. T1: OR = 2.10; 95% CI, 1.22–3.59; P = 0.007), whereas no significant associations emerged in men. In contrast, UPFs intake was not significantly associated with low QoL.Conclusion: Higher UPF intake is significantly associated with an elevated prevalence of depression among community-dwelling older adults, with women appearing particularly susceptible. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to clarify causal pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hallajzadeh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: