Multilevel mediation study shows teachers’ AI-TPACK affects student writing through perceived instructional quality.
Purpose With the rapid and widespread adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in modern L2 writing instruction, teachers face an urgent need to convert GenAI-oriented capacity into ethical and process-based instructional support.Design Based on the writing-oriented Artificial Intelligence–Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (AI-TPACK) framework and the boundary-making perspective, this study constructs a two-wave (T1–T2) multilevel mediation model in which teachers’ AI-TPACK and scenario-based pedagogical judgment (SPJ) indirectly affect students’ learning outcomes through classroom-shared perceived instructional quality (PIQ), operationalised as the between-class component of student-reported instructional quality. The sample included 51 university EFL writing teachers and 513 students from five research-intensive universities in Eastern China, complemented by interviews with 12 teachers.Findings Change-adjusted analyses yielded the following findings. First, both professional capacities were positively correlated with PIQ. Second, PIQ was positively associated with students’ writing ability, indexed by self-efficacy and self-regulation. This pattern was also supported by blind ratings of T2 writing tasks completed without GenAI assistance. Interview data indicated that effective GenAI-mediated instruction relied on routinised boundary clarification, explicit criteria for acceptable GenAI use, and verification-oriented accountability.Originality/Value This study highlights that teachers’ professional capacities matter for L2 writing development through PIQ, understood as students’ shared perceptions of enacted instructional practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: