Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analyzes ecosystem service dynamics in arid regions, highlighting trade-offs and synergies within landscapes.
Understanding how land use/cover change (LUCC) mediates the interactions among ecosystem services (ES) is crucial for sustaining fragile landscapes worldwide. This study addresses this challenge in the arid Mountain-Oasis-Desert System (MODS), a coupled socio-ecological complex where water-limited environments intensify human-nature conflicts. Taking the Aksu MODS as a typical case, we developed an integrated assessment framework combining a locally calibrated Ecosystem Service Value (ESV) model with the biophysical InVEST model (for carbon storage, habitat quality, and water yield) to analyze ES dynamics and their trade-offs/synergies from 1990 to 2020. Results revealed a dramatic LUCC, with cultivated and construction land expanding by 83.06% and 93.19%, respectively, at the expense of grassland and water areas. Consequently, total ESV declined markedly, exhibiting increasing spatial heterogeneity. A fundamental subsystem divergence emerged: while synergistic relationships dominated in mountain and desert areas, the human-dominated oasis became a hotspot of trade-offs, with 81.82% of ES pairs showing significant trade-offs, particularly between food production and water-related regulation. InVEST modeling corroborated this pattern, indicating stable total carbon storage (~ 4.0 × 10⁹ t) but a severe decline in water yield (from 1.82 × 10⁶ mm to 0.86 × 10⁶ mm), with grassland degradation serving as a key proximate mechanism. Our findings demonstrate that ES interactions are not uniform but are fundamentally shaped by subsystem-specific LUCC trajectories. This underscores the imperative of spatially differentiated management to mitigate trade-offs in vulnerable arid landscapes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: