Mixed-methods research investigates the efficiency of modular façade systems in post-disaster housing, suggesting feasible improvements.
The increasing demand for permanent post-disaster housing highlights the need for rapid and high-quality construction methods. This study investigates the feasibility of prefabricated modular façade systems in accelerating post-disaster permanent housing construction, while maintaining cost efficiency and construction quality. Unlike previous studies that primarily focus on fully modular building systems, this research examines façade-level prefabrication as an intermediate and scalable strategy that can be integrated into conventional post-disaster housing construction. A mixed-methods approach was adopted: semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 industry stakeholders, and thematic analysis was applied to extract qualitative insights. Subsequently, a quantitative survey involving 366 construction professionals was carried out and statistically analyzed to validate the findings. Additionally, case studies from previous post-disaster reconstruction efforts were reviewed to contextualize the results. The findings reveal that prefabricated modular façade systems improve construction speed, implementation efficiency, and quality control. Evidence from semi-structured interviews, the survey of 366 construction professionals, and representative case-project comparisons consistently supported the applicability of façade-level prefabrication in post-disaster housing delivery. Most participants also noted quality control benefits inherent to factory-based production. However, the study identifies several limitations, including challenges related to cost and workforce training. The research contributes to the evolving discourse on disaster-responsive housing policies and provides strategic recommendations to enhance the adoption of modular façade technologies in construction practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Başdoğan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: