Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental investigation determines binding energies of fluorinated refrigerants on ice surfaces, suggesting environmental impact.
Ice surfaces in the upper troposphere and polar regions act as chemically active interfaces that regulate the uptake and fate of trace gases; however, the interactions of fluorinated refrigerants with amorphous solid water (ASW) have remained poorly constrained. Here, we combine temperature-programmed desorption (TPD), infrared (IR) spectroscopy, and density functional theory (DFT) to investigate the adsorption of 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a; CF 3 CH 2 F), 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (R1234yf; CF 3 CF═CH 2 ), and 3,3,3-trifluoropropene (R1243zf; CF 3 CH═CH 2 ) on porous ASW. TPD profiles reveal a pronounced shift in the primary desorption feature from 95–105 K (pure films) to 140–152 K on ASW, indicating enhanced binding. Desorption energies are (51 ± 4), (48 ± 3), and (45 ± 6) kJ mol –1, respectively, with an additional codesorption feature at 155–170 K evidencing partial trapping within the ice matrix. IR spectra exhibit red shifts of 11–21 cm –1 in the 1000–1500 cm –1 C–F stretching region, consistent with hydrogen bonding with the surface water network and long-range dipole interaction. DFT calculations reproduce these shifts and identify adsorption geometries governed by fluorine–OH interactions. These results demonstrate that fluorinated refrigerants can be transiently sequestered on ice, with implications for their atmospheric transport and reactivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mondal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: