Randomized trial compares hypertrophic adaptations in various resistance training intensity and motion ranges, suggesting new insights for athletic training.
McMahon, G, Morse, C, Burden, A, Winwood, K, and Onambele–Pearson, G. Moderate intensity resistance training with partial range-of-motion at long muscle lengths elicits similar hypertrophy and architectural adaptations as high intensity resistance training using full range-of-motion. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2026—Resistance training (RT) elicits varying magnitudes of active and passive forces in muscle. Evidence is lacking comparing chronic RT outcomes including muscle thickness (MTH) and muscle architecture (fascicle length [Lf], pennation angle [pen]) performing training at shorter, longer, and full ranges-of-motion (ROM). A total of 45 subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups—shortened partial ROM (SP, 0–50° knee flexion, 80% 1 repetition maximum [1RM]), lengthened partial ROM (LP, 40–90° knee flexion, 55% 1RM), full ROM (FROM, 0–90° knee flexion, 80% 1RM), or control (CON)—completing 8 weeks of knee extensor exercise. Vastus Lateralis MTH, PEN, and Lf were measured at 25, 50, and 75% femur length pre–post training and analyzed as delta (Δ) change (%); statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. ΔMTH was greater in LP and FROM ( p < 0.05) vs. SP at 75%. ΔMTH LP was greater than SP at 25% ( p < 0.05) and ΔMTH FROM was greater than SP at 50% ( p < 0.05) with no differences between LP and FROM at any location. ΔLf was greater in LP vs. FROM ( p < 0.05) at 25 and 75%, and LP vs. SP ( p < 0.05) at all sites. ΔLf was greater in FROM vs. SP ( p < 0.05) at 50 and 75%. Absolute and normalized baseline Lf was inversely correlated with ΔLf in all groups ( p < 0.001). This study provides novel evidence that moderate-intensity RT with partial ROM at long muscle lengths elicits similar hypertrophic and superior Lf adaptations as high-intensity full ROM training. These findings challenge traditional RT prescription, offering new insights for optimizing muscle size and architecture in athletic populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McMahon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: