Comparison of evolutionary, reinforcement and active learning for simulation-based design space exploration

Trade-off studies often use the design of experiments approach, while simulation models enable data-based product optimization by AI. This paper presents a comparison of evolutionary algorithms, reinforcement learning as well as active learning for design space exploration. Based on a real-world case study and hypervolume analysis, the performance of selected algorithms is assessed. The results highlight their ability to identify pareto fronts and provide insights to deepen the understanding of AI-driven design space exploration.