Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative study identifies how trusted community volunteers enhance evacuation outcomes in vulnerable populations, indicating new intervention strategies.
When institutional warning channels fail to convert hazard knowledge into protective action, community-embedded volunteers become critical intermediaries for reaching socially vulnerable populations. Drawing on an embedded qualitative case study of the 2025 Matai'an Stream landslide-dam overflow in Hualien, Taiwan — an event that generated nineteen official alerts yet produced spatially uneven evacuation outcomes — this study identifies three sequential mechanisms through which trusted community volunteers translate official risk knowledge into protective action across the acute warning phase and the post-disaster relief and recovery phase. Using reflexive thematic analysis of 22 semi-structured interviews, four expert key informant interviews, and forum observation within a Context–Mechanism–Outcome framework, three findings emerge: swift trust formation, activated through physical co-presence, institutional identity cues, and food provision rituals, constitutes the entry condition for knowledge exchange; trusted volunteers function as verification nodes when alert fatigue erodes official channel credibility; and translation efficacy is higher among volunteers with long-term community embeddedness. Taiwan's Disaster Prevention and Protection Act contains no provisions for elderly or digitally excluded residents, positioning trusted agents as load-bearing elements. Findings inform Sendai Framework Priorities 1 and 4 and support hybrid digital–analogue early warning architectures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: