Retrospective pilot study compares diagnostic performance of aspiration vs. capillary techniques for thyroid nodules, indicating similar effectiveness.
Background/Objectives: Although ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy with suction (FNA-S) is preferred for evaluating thyroid nodules, the capillary technique (FNA-C) is also used. However, the diagnostic performance of both techniques remains unclear. Our objective was to compare the diagnostic performance of FNA-S versus FNA-C for thyroid nodules. Methods: This retrospective, observational, exploratory, single-center pilot evaluation study was conducted at a tertiary hospital from January 2023 to June 2024. A total of 157 ultrasound-guided FNA biopsies were prospectively analyzed, comprising 71 FNA-S and 86 FNA-C procedures. Clinical, ultrasound, and cytological parameters were evaluated to compare the rates of non-diagnostic samples (Bethesda I) and the necessity for repeat punctures. Bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression were conducted. Results: Both techniques exhibited comparable rates of non-diagnostic samples (28.17% for FNA-S and 27.91% for FNA-C; p = 0.220) and repetition rates (38.03% for FNA-S and 43.02% for FNA-C; p = 0.637). The only factors significantly associated with sample adequacy, regardless of techniques employed, were the location and composition of the nodule. Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided FNA-S and FNA-C yield similar diagnostic performance for biopsy of thyroid nodules. The choice may depend on operator preference and nodule characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Echeverría et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: