Examines how teachers' beliefs affect mathematical problem solving in classrooms, suggesting a need for professional support.
In China’s latest mathematics curriculum, project-based learning (PBL) foregrounds mathematical problem solving (MPS) as student-led inquiry in authentic contexts. This study examines teachers’ beliefs about MPS within PBL, and how such beliefs are enacted in planning and teaching. Using a constant comparative approach, we drew on interviews, lesson plans, and reflective accounts from 14 mathematics teachers. Most teachers emphasised application and creativity, positioning themselves as guides/supporters who facilitate students’ exploration. Consistent with these beliefs, lesson plans commonly drew on personally and socially grounded contexts and featured challenging, open-ended tasks attending to cognitive breadth and depth. While espoused beliefs largely aligned with described implementation, a minority endorsed procedure-focused instruction, revealing tensions between exploration- and content-oriented approaches. Examining teachers’ beliefs can inform understanding of progress in curriculum reform. Sustained, long-term professional learning—supported by institutional resources and professional autonomy—is needed to help teachers navigate these tensions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: