Study synthesizes SnO2 nanoparticles with varying temperatures, indicating tunable properties for diverse applications.
Tin oxide (SnO₂) nanoparticles have been receiving increasing attention due to their structural, electrical, optical properties and diverse applications. In this study, nanoparticles were synthesized via a hydrothermal route using an autoclave, where the reaction temperature was systematically varied to control and tune the morphology of the nanomaterials. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis identified the crystal structure of as-synthesized SnO₂ nanoparticles. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis confirmed the crystalline tetragonal rutile SnO₂ nanoparticles. But average crystallite sizes were found to be ⁓15 and ⁓3 nm for hydrothermal temperatures of 110°C and 150°C respectively. A significant reduction in particle size was observed with increasing hydrothermal temperature. Vis spectroscopy revealed stronger absorption for SnO₂ nanoparticles synthesized at 110°C. Strong absorption was observed in the shorter wavelength region for 110°C, in the contrary that was observed in the longer wavelength region for 150°C.The estimated band gap energies were 1.2 eV and 1.6 eV for temperature of 110°C and 150°C respectively, that identified an increase in band gap with increasing temperature. Overall transmittance was comparatively lower for SnO₂ 110°C. Specifically, higher transmittance was exhibited in the lower and higher energy region for hydrothermal temperature of 110 °C and 150 °C respectively. Energy transmission was higher for lower band gap and that was lower for higher band gap. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy identified a characteristic absorption peak at 628 cm⁻¹ corresponding to SnO₂ stretching vibrations. Overall, hydrothermal temperature significantly influenced the crystallite size, optical absorption & transmission, and band gap of the synthesized SnO₂ nanoparticles. These tunable properties suggest that the prepared SnO₂ nanoparticles may be promising candidates for applications in photocatalysis, optoelectronic devices, transparent conducting materials, and renewable energy technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bonna et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: