Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study evaluates milk quality and mastitis burden in small ruminants, suggesting vital support needs.
This cross-sectional study assessed bulk-tank raw milk quality, subclinical mastitis burden, and farmers’ health management practices across 83 sheep and goat farms in the Epirus Region of northwestern Greece (October 2022–April 2023). Bulk-tank milk composition (fat 5.82%, protein 5.35%, lactose 4.82%) was consistent with Mediterranean small-ruminant norms. Mean somatic cell count (SCC) was 1123 ± 913 × 103 cells/mL (median 883 × 103); only 10.0% of farms met the healthy threshold (SCC ≤ 200 × 103 cells/mL) and 26.2% exceeded the EU limit of 1500 × 103 cells/mL (Regulation EC No 853/2004). SCC correlated positively with total bacterial count (Spearman ρ = 0.549, p < 0.001). Farmers were predominantly middle-aged (50.0 ± 11.8 years), exclusively male, and had low levels of formal education (9.0% university-educated); only 14.3% had regular veterinary support, and 34.9% practised post-milking teat dipping. Despite 51.3% self-reporting mastitis, no management or demographic variable was significantly associated with SCC after Bonferroni correction; education showed the strongest trend (Kruskal–Wallis H = 9.13, p = 0.058). The findings reveal widespread, largely undiagnosed subclinical mastitis driven by structural gaps in veterinary support, education, and hygiene practice, with direct implications for animal health and targeted advisory intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaimakamis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: