This analysis demonstrates differences in travel times and energies of brachistochrones in Kerr spacetime, indicating significant implications for particle dynamics.
Building on Perlick's formulation of the brachistochrone problem in stationary spacetimes~{Perlick1991} and on the optical Randers--Finsler framework for stationary metrics~{GibbonsHerdeiroWarnickWerner2009,Randers1941}, we give a unified treatment of the two brachistochrones of a test particle in the Kerr field: the one minimizing the coordinate time t and the one minimizing the proper time τ. On the equatorial plane Tₜ is the length of a Randers metric, due to a linear gravitomagnetic term, whereas T_τ is purely Riemannian. We derive the first integrals, exact orbit equations, travel times, and Hamiltonian formulations for both branches. From the equatorial Hamiltonians we obtain a new analytical result: for common initial phase-space data the two branches carry different on-shell energies, H₀^τ/H₀ᵗ→ E²/f₀², and this, combined with the gravitomagnetic enhancement of the centrifugal barrier, produces an inversion of the radial plunge across a critical angular momentum Jᵢₙᵥ(a). The resulting closed-form criterion is validated numerically to four significant digits. Off the equator the brachistochrone Hamilton--Jacobi equation is non-separable: the conformal factor n_τ²=F/DE obstructs Carter separation at finite energy, while separability is recovered in the Fermat limit. We therefore construct approximate quasi-invariants by perturbative Poisson-bracket closure: for τ a single O(a²) term reduces the drift, while for t the bare Carter form is already optimal. We also verify the a→0 Schwarzschild limit, develop spin and weak-field expansions, and extend the construction toward the ergoregion using ZAMO variables. These results complement the companion interior treatments~{Rosignoli2026Schw,Rosignoli2026TOV}.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iman Rosignoli (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: