Develops a framework to improve functional surfaces in automotive engineering, suggesting better design and material integration.
This paper proposes a methodical framework for developing functional surfaces and coatings for circular automotive applications. It addresses three gaps: the missing classification of surface mechanisms, limited empirical PSPP models, and the lack of an integrated link between microstructural surface design and system-level development. The framework connects top-down design with bottom-up materials engineering, introduces working-principle analogues in design catalogues, and offers the use of DoE and sensitivity analysis to build predictive PSPP models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kizgin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: