Mixed-methods study identifies accessibility needs in students, suggesting essential support for inclusion.
Barriers limit laboratory participation for students with study-impairing conditions. A mixed-methods study via survey (n=43) and interviews (n=9) identified two student clusters with distinct accessibility needs: Cluster 1 requiring flexible scheduling and modular structure for chronic illness and caregiving; Cluster 2 requiring explicit guidance and multi-modal content for visual impairment and neurodivergence. Both required institutional support infrastructure. Results establish evidence-based requirements for inclusive remote laboratory development applicable beyond target populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Göktaş et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: