Key result
Marginal loss and aBCE outperform aCCE for inter-domain echocardiography segmentation with missing labels.
Why the study?
Developing automated segmentation models for cardiac structures is challenged by the difficulty of training on datasets from different sources that are often partially-labelled.
Marginal loss is the most robust loss function for training deep learning echocardiography segmentation models on inter-domain datasets with multiple missing labels.
May aid robust echocardiography segmentation with missing labels; leaves open clinical translation pending prospective validation.
Echocardiography is the first imaging modality used for assessing cardiac function, and accurate segmentation of cardiac structures is essential for deriving biomarkers. However, the development of effective automated segmentation models for multiple cardiac structures is challenged by the difficulty of training on datasets from different sources that are often partially-labelled. This study aims to address this challenge by evaluating the performance of three loss functions - adaptive categorical cross entropy (aCCE) loss, marginal loss, and the adaptive binary cross entropy (aBCE) loss - in handling partially-labelled data. We conduct a comprehensive comparison of these loss functions across multiple scenarios and network architectures (R2.1): intra-domain and inter-domain tasks, with both single and multiple partial-labels, and varying proportions of fully-labelled to partially-labelled data. Our experiments reveal that all three loss functions exhibit strong performance in intra- domain segmentation tasks, effectively handling label variations within the same domain. For inter-domain tasks, where models are trained on datasets with a domain shift, the aBCE and marginal losses show superior performance when dealing with the case of one label being missing from some training examples. In scenarios involving more than one label being missing, marginal loss outperforms the other methods, demonstrating its robustness in such complex conditions. These results highlight the strengths of each loss function depending on the labelling scenario, emphasizing the importance of selecting the appropriate loss function to optimize model performance. This study represents the first investigation of techniques for handling partially-labelled data from multiple different domains in echocardiography segmentation and provides a comprehensive comparison of loss-based (R3.4) solutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Islam et al. (2026) studied Echocardiography segmentation. Loss functions (aCCE, marginal loss, aBCE) vs. Each other was evaluated on Segmentation performance in intra-domain and inter-domain tasks with partially-labelled data. Marginal loss and adaptive binary cross entropy (aBCE) showed superior performance for inter-domain echocardiography segmentation tasks with missing labels compared to aCCE.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: