Key result
Genotyped LQTS patients exhibited increased beat-to-beat T-wave amplitude variability during the Day Fast period compared to matched controls (mean TAV 34 vs 27 microV; P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does beat-to-beat T-wave amplitude variability differ between genotyped LQTS patients and normal controls?
Case-Control (n=140)
Does beat-to-beat T-wave amplitude variability differ between genotyped LQTS patients and normal controls?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Beat-to-beat T-wave amplitude variability is increased in genotyped LQTS patients compared to controls, with patterns modulated by circadian influences and genotype.
AIMS: Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a primary electrical disease characterized by QT prolongation and increased repolarization dispersion leading to T-wave amplitude beat-to-beat changes. We aimed to quantify beat-to-beat T-wave amplitude variability from ambulatory Holter recordings in genotyped LQTS patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy genotyped LQTS patients (mean age 23 +/- 15 years, 42 males, 50% LQT1, 39% LQT2, and 11% LQT3) and 70 normal matched control subjects underwent a 24-h digital Holter recording. Using the Tvar software (Ela Medical, Sorin group), the beat-to-beat variance of the T-wave amplitude (TAV in microV) [corrected] was assessed on 50-ms consecutive clusters during three 1-h periods: one with around average diurnal heart rate (Day Fast), one nocturnal period (Night), and one diurnal period with around average nocturnal heart rate (Day Slow). TAV was increased in LQTS patients during the two diurnal periods but not at night (during the Day Fast period, mean TAV was 34 +/- 20 microV [corrected] in LQTS patients vs. 27 +/- 10 microV [corrected] in controls, P < 0.05). This effect depended on the genotype. In LQT1, TAV was larger when compared with controls for both Day Fast and Slow periods, but in LQT2 only Day Fast shows higher TAV. Oppositely, in LQT3 the TAV was higher than in the control group during the Day slow period (mean TAV = 34 +/- 20 vs. 25 +/- 8 microV [corrected] in controls, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In genotyped LQTS patients beat-to-beat T-wave amplitude variability was increased when compared with control subjects. That pattern was modulated by circadian influences in a gene-dependent manner.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Extramiana et al. (2010) conducted a case-control in Long QT syndrome (n=140). Long QT syndrome vs. Normal matched control subjects was evaluated on Beat-to-beat variance of the T-wave amplitude (TAV) during the Day Fast period (p=<0.05). Genotyped LQTS patients exhibited increased beat-to-beat T-wave amplitude variability during the Day Fast period compared to matched controls (mean TAV 34 vs 27 microV; P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: