Key result
Coxsackievirus B5 was isolated from 40.5% (17/42) of tested cerebrospinal fluid specimens during a 2009 aseptic meningitis outbreak in China, revealing two distinct transmission chains.
Observational (n=2,104)
The 2009 aseptic meningitis outbreak in Shandong, China, involving over 2,000 cases, was caused by at least two distinct transmission chains of Coxsackievirus B5.
Supports CVB5 surveillance in aseptic meningitis outbreaks; leaves open dynamics of multiple enteroviral transmission chains.
In 2009, a major outbreak of aseptic meningitis was noted in Linyi city, Shandong province, China. From June to September 2009, a total of 2,104 cases were involved in this outbreak, and 98.6% of patients were <16 years of age. To determine the pathogen of the outbreak, 42 cerebrospinal fluid specimens collected from aseptic meningitis cases were tested for cell culture, and 17 (40.5%) enteroviruses were isolated and identified as Coxsackievirus B5 (CVB5). Homologous comparison indicated that these isolates had 0-7.7% nucleotide divergence with each other. Phylogenetic reconstruction showed global CVB5 could be separated into four genogroups, and all Linyi CVB5 isolates belonged to the genogroup C which had been circulating for recent 27 years in Asia and Europe. Interestingly, two distinct lineages were observed for the 17 isolates in the phylogenetic tree, indicating that at least two different transmission chains of CVB5 were responsible for this outbreak. This study showed that CVB5-associated aseptic meningitis is an emerging concern in China.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Aseptic meningitis (n=2,104). Coxsackievirus B5 (CVB5) was evaluated on Pathogen identification from cerebrospinal fluid specimens. Coxsackievirus B5 was isolated from 40.5% (17/42) of tested cerebrospinal fluid specimens during a 2009 aseptic meningitis outbreak in China, revealing two distinct transmission chains.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: