Living in the lowest socioeconomic quartile was associated with nearly double the incidence of sudden cardiac arrest compared to the highest quartile (IRR 1.9; 95% CI 1.8-2.0).
Observational (n=9,235)
Yes
Does low socioeconomic status increase the incidence of sudden cardiac arrest in urban populations?
Lower socioeconomic status is associated with a nearly twofold higher incidence of sudden cardiac arrest, with a more pronounced disparity in younger individuals and in the US compared to Canada.
Relative Risk: 1.9 (95% CI 1.8–2)
BACKGROUND: Low socioeconomic status is associated with poor cardiovascular health. We evaluated the association between socioeconomic status and the incidence of sudden cardiac arrest, a condition that accounts for a substantial proportion of cardiovascular-related deaths, in seven large North American urban populations. METHODS: Using a population-based registry, we collected data on out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrests occurring at home or at a residential institution from Apr. 1, 2006, to Mar. 31, 2007. We limited the analysis to cardiac arrests in seven metropolitan areas in the United States (Dallas, Texas; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Portland, Oregon; and Seattle-King County, Washington) and Canada (Ottawa and Toronto, Ontario; and Vancouver, British Columbia). Each incident was linked to a census tract; tracts were classified into quartiles of median household income. RESULTS: A total of 9235 sudden cardiac arrests were included in the analysis. For all sites combined, the incidence of sudden cardiac arrestin the lowest socioeconomic quartile was nearly double that in the highest quartile (incidence rate ratio IRR 1.9, 95% confidence interval CI 1.8-2.0). This disparity was greater among people less than 65 years old (IRR 2.7, 95% CI 2.5-3.0) than among those 65 or older (IRR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.4). After adjustment for study site and for population age structure of each census tract, the disparity across socioeconomic quartiles for all ages combined was greater in the United States (IRR 2.0, 95% CI 1.9-2.2) than in Canada (IRR 1.8, 95% CI 1.6-2.0) (p<0.001 for interaction). INTERPRETATION: The incidence of sudden cardiac arrest at home or at a residential institution was higher in poorer neighbourhoods of the US and Canadian sites studied, although the association was attenuated in Canada. The disparity across socioeconomic quartiles was greatest among people younger than 65. The association between socioeconomic status and incidence of sudden cardiac arrest merits consideration in the development of strategies to improve survival from sudden cardiac arrest, and possibly to identify opportunities for prevention.
Reinier et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in Sudden cardiac arrest (n=9,235). Lowest socioeconomic quartile vs. Highest socioeconomic quartile was evaluated on Incidence of sudden cardiac arrest (IRR 1.9, 95% CI 1.8-2.0). Living in the lowest socioeconomic quartile was associated with nearly double the incidence of sudden cardiac arrest compared to the highest quartile (IRR 1.9; 95% CI 1.8-2.0).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: