Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates conformal embeddings in minimal models, suggesting new algebra connections.
Vafa and Warner observed that the Landau–Ginzburg model associated to the potential E₆ E 6 (resp. E₈ E 8 ) is a product of two other models, associated to the potentials A₂ A 2 and A₃ A 3 (resp. A₂ A 2 and A₄ A 4 ). We translate this along the Landau–Ginzburg/conformal field theory correspondence to a conjecture about the unitary minimal quotients Md M d of the $$N=2$$ N = 2 superconformal algebra of central charge cd=3-6/d c d = 3 - 6 d : there should be a conformal embedding M₁₂ M₃ ⊗ M₄ M 12 ↪ M 3 ⊗ M 4 (resp. M₃₀ M₃ ⊗ M₅ M 30 ↪ M 3 ⊗ M 5 ) that exhibits the product as Ostrik’s E₆ E 6 (resp. E₈ E 8 ) algebra in the Rep(su(2)₁₀) Rep ( s u ( 2 ) 10
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Camacho et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: