Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study evaluated drying performance of indirect solar dryer for dehydrating tomatoes, suggesting improved efficiency with higher solar radiation.
A forced convection-assisted indirect solar dryer (ISD) was designed and evaluated for dehydrating sliced tomatoes intended for tomato powder production. Experimental tests were conducted across five months (December to April), representing a range from the coldest to hottest periods of the year. During each test, 10 kg of fresh tomato slices were loaded into the dryer and dried daily from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. until the target moisture content of approximately 6% (wet basis) was achieved. During experimental tests, direct normal irradiation (DNI) from the sun varied from 200 W/m2 to 850 W/m2. The drying time was reduced to 19 hours for the test conducted in April in comparison to 35.5 hours in December to reach the desired moisture content, indicating a 46.47% reduction in the drying time. The dryer exhibited an average thermal efficiency of 20.95% for the test conducted in December, which increased to 27.43% for the test conducted in April. With a rise in DNI values from December to April, the dryer exhibited a higher rate of drying, viz., 10.91 × 10−5 kg/s for April in comparison to 7.27 × 10−5 kg/s for December. The Page model best described drying kinetics under varying solar radiation, yielding R2 values of 0.9634–0.9849.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fegade et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: