Extended replication study examines psychometric properties of IIP-32 in English and Dutch, indicating reliability and validity.
The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP) can be used to assess respondents’ general interpersonal distress and specific interpersonal style. In addition to a 64-item version, multiple 32-item versions exist. This includes the IIP-32 that is also in the IIP-64 manual and the IIP—Short Circumplex (IIP-SC); both were previously derived from the IIP-64. The psychometric characteristics of the English IIP–SC were previously assessed in an American student sample. The psychometric characteristics of a Dutch IIP-32 were previously assessed in a Flemish student sample. The present study aimed to replicate this work in English-speaking international students, and extend it to Dutch students. Participants were students in an undergraduate Psychology program in the Netherlands who completed the IIP-64, the Borderline Features scale of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI-BOR), and the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) in English (n = 234) or Dutch (n = 326). IIP-32 and IIP-SC scores were derived from IIP-64 scores. We provide data on the reliability, structural validity, and (using the PAI-BOR and NPI) construct validity of the English and Dutch IIP–SC and IIP-32. Both IIP versions were psychometrically acceptable. We also provide English and Dutch normative data for use in future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rot et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: