Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed-method study explores progress tracking in annual reviews of education health care plans, implicating clearer frameworks.
This study explored how Education, Health and Care Plans are used to evaluate progress in Annual Reviews within a Local Authority. Using a mixed-method, action-oriented design, it combined document analysis with stakeholder interviews. Findings identified inconsistent conceptualisation and reporting of progress, alongside unclear outcome frameworks and limited multi-agency integration. These issues hindered shared understanding, co-production, and decision-making. The study highlights the need for procedural coherence and clearer assessment practices, including improved assessment literacy and collaborative sense-making. Recommendations include integrated system design, shared outcome frameworks (e.g. Goal-Based Outcomes), coordinated specialist input and formative assessment approaches. Our findings underline the role of Educational Psychologists in supporting system-level change through facilitating shared meaning-making and improving evaluation practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cowell et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: