Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) in mountain–basin transition zones remains challenging because conventional approaches rely mainly on historical inventories and static conditioning factors, whereas independent deformation evidence is seldom incorporated to refine susceptibility zonation. This study proposes an integrated LSM framework for the Xining Basin by coupling a Mamba-based model (Mamba-LSM) with SBAS-InSAR-based deformation-informed bidirectional reclassification, with the key innovation lying in the use of independent deformation evidence to refine susceptibility zonation after model prediction. Specifically, Mamba-LSM integrates six-channel neighborhood patches, CNN-based local spatial encoding, and Mamba-based latent feature transformation to improve the representation of local terrain context for landslide susceptibility assessment. Results show that Mamba-LSM achieved the highest AUC among the evaluated models, reaching 0.9011 with an F1-score of 0.7431. After deformation-informed bidirectional reclassification, the high- and very-high-susceptibility classes occupied only 25.31% of the study area but contained 69.84% of the mapped landslides, and were concentrated mainly in valley–mountain transition belts, river-incised slopes, and engineering-disturbed sectors where SBAS-InSAR deformation hotspots were also preferentially distributed. These findings demonstrate that integrating independent SBAS-InSAR deformation evidence can improve both the spatial concentration of landslides in high-susceptibility zones and the physical interpretability of susceptibility zonation.
Yang et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: