Evaluates vehicle detection models, showing functional analysis enhances object counting accuracy.
The rapid development of deep learning methods has significantly improved the effectiveness of object detection in Earth Observation (EO) imagery. However, standard metrics such as Mean Average Precision (mAP) do not fully reflect their utility in operational analyses. This paper proposes a multi-stage methodology for evaluating vehicle detection models, combining classical evaluation with functional analysis encompassing object counting, density estimation, and occupancy index. The research was conducted on high-resolution imagery (WorldView, Pleiades) and the xView dataset, evaluating five YOLO variants alongside transformer-based and two-stage detectors under three training strategies, including fine-tuning. The results show that models achieving high mAP values (up to 0.952) can simultaneously produce significant errors in object count estimation. Models trained exclusively on xView exhibit a substantial performance drop (mAP@0.50 ≈ 0.45) under domain shift conditions. The best results were obtained using a fusion-based approach combining YOLOv9 and YOLOv12, which reduced the mean relative error to 0.14 and the counting error to 13 objects, maintaining a low density error (0.0023). Functional validation across 20 parking areas confirmed the stability of the proposed approach. The findings confirm that functional analysis constitutes a critical complement to classical evaluation in remote sensing applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wierzbicki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: