Randomized trial examines market-risk changes in major Chinese financial institutions, suggesting selective repricing post SVB failure.
This study investigates whether the March 2023 failure of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) coincided with changes in market-risk exposure, abnormal returns, and return connectedness among five major Chinese financial institutions. Using daily data from January 2022 to December 2023, we apply CAPM and market-model regressions, structural-break tests, event-study methods, and generalized forecast-error variance decompositions. The revised design distinguishes 10 March from the first subsequent Chinese trading day, 13 March, and adds symmetric event windows, placebo tests, an alternative risk-free rate, return-series audits, significance tests, and VAR diagnostics. Full-sample Chow tests identify breaks for ICBC and CITIC Securities, but only ICBC remains significant within the ±60-day window, and none are significant within ±30 days. Only ICBC records a significant positive CAR over [−3, +3]. Overall connectedness falls from 55.53% to 47.98%, while CITIC Securities becomes the largest post-event net transmitter. The evidence therefore indicates selective repricing and reconfigured linkages rather than a system-wide effect, and does not support unique causal attribution to SVB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: