Key result
Perceval sutureless aortic valves achieve 94% one-year valve-related survival in high-risk patients.
Why the study?
Sutureless AVR provides reduced procedural times and satisfactory haemodynamic results, but mid-term data on valve-related outcomes remain scarce.
Does Perceval sutureless aortic valve implantation provide high one-year valve-related survival in high-risk aortic stenosis patients?
Cohort (n=50)
No
Does Perceval sutureless aortic valve implantation provide high one-year valve-related survival in high-risk aortic stenosis patients?
Perceval sutureless aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients yields excellent 1-year valve-related survival (94%) and favorable hemodynamics, though it is associated with a 20% rate of permanent pacemaker implantation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports feasibility in high-risk AVR; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Sutureless aortic valve replacement (AVR) has been recognised as a potential option in the management of High-risk patients, characterised by reduced procedural times and satisfactory haemodynamic results. However, mid-term results of valve-related outcomes are scarce. This study aimed to investigate clinical, echocardiographic, and valve-related outcomes of high-risk patients undergoing Perceval sutureless AVR. METHODS: The current retrospective, single-centre study included 50 consecutive high-risk patients who had isolated Perceval sutureless AVR. The time period was between January 2023 and December 2024. The primary endpoint was one-year valve-related survival. The secondary endpoints included echocardiographic performance, paravalvular leakage (PVL), patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM), and the need for pacemaker implantation. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed at discharge and follow-up. RESULTS: at 12 months. No case of severe patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) was noted, but moderate PPM occurred in 12%. PVL was trivial or mild in all patients. Permanent pacemaker implantation was necessary in 20%, all within the index hospitalisation period, without any recovery of native conduction at follow-up. Valve-related survival at 12 months was 94%, with death from non-valve-related causes. CONCLUSION: Sutureless Perceval aortic valve implantation has been shown to provide excellent clinical and haemodynamic results at midterm follow-up in high-risk patients with low rates of valve-related complications, PVL, and patient prosthesis mismatch.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emced Khalil (2026) conducted a cohort in High-risk aortic stenosis (n=50). Perceval sutureless aortic valve implantation was evaluated on One-year valve-related survival. Perceval sutureless aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients resulted in a 94% valve-related survival at 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: