Why the study?
An aging population and rising comorbidities urge safer alternatives to surgical treatment, warranting assessment of the performance, safety, and durability of the Perceval sutureless prosthetic valve.
Population
196 adult patients with aortic valve disease undergoing AVR
Comparison
Perceval sutureless prosthetic valve implantation
Design
Single center retrospective longitudinal cohort study
Follow-up
Up to 5-year follow-up
Authors
Loading...
Supports sutureless AVR in selected patients; extends observational data but leaves open randomized comparisons.
Sutureless bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement demonstrates excellent procedural success, safety, and hemodynamic performance up to 5 years of follow-up.
Ferreira et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: