Shows improved accuracy in reconstructing oceanic variables, suggesting better data utilization.
Satellite-derived oceanic data are frequently affected by cloud cover, resulting in spatiotemporal gaps. The Multi-DINEOF method is widely used to reconstruct multiple oceanic variables. However, Multi-DINEOF essentially remains a matrix-based DINEOF approach and does not fully leverage the correlations among multiple variables. To address this limitation, this study proposes the T-DINEOF model, aiming to improve the accuracy of reconstructing multiple oceanic variables simultaneously. When applied to sea surface temperature (SST), sea surface chlorophyll a (SCHL), and sea surface wind (SSW) collectively, T-DINEOF reduces root mean square error (RMSE) by 12.9 %, mean absolute error (MAE) by 13.8 %, and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) by 11.9 % compared to Multi-DINEOF. For each individual oceanic variable, T-DINEOF outperforms both Multi-DINEOF and the original DINEOF methods, reducing RMSE by 9.0 % and 14.7 %, MAE by 10.5 % and 14.6 %, and MAPE by 13.7 % and 13.4 % for SST; reducing RMSE by 9.3 % and 11.8 %, MAE by 9.9 % and 13.4 %, and MAPE by 8.3 % and 11.8 % for SCHL; and reducing RMSE by 16.6 % and 3.7 %, MAE by 16.8 % and 3.5 %, and MAPE by 16.4 % and 3.1 % for SSW. Additionally, T-DINEOF proves effective in regions with a high proportion of missing data and in cases of low data correlation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ping et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: