Active controlled trial demonstrates differing hypertrophy effects of bloodflow-restricted and high-load resistance training in healthy adults, suggesting optimal training strategies.
Background: Low-load bloodflow-restricted (BFR) resistance training (LLBFR-RT) has been shown to elicit muscular hypertrophy comparable with high-load resistance training (HL-RT). We aimed to explore the differential impact of LLBFR-RT and HL-RT on hypertrophy of the triceps surae. Hypothesis: LLBFR-RT would be more effective than HL-RT for soleus muscle hypertrophy. In addition, it was hypothesized that HL-RT would be more effective than LLBFR-RT for the hypertrophy of both gastrocnemii. Study Design: An active controlled trial. Level of Evidence: Level 2. Methods: A total of 28 healthy adults were assigned randomly to 2 unilateral plantar-flexion training regimens: HL-RT (75% of 1-repetition maximum [1RM], 4 sets, 10 repetitions) and LLBFR-RT (20% of 1RM, 4 sets, 30+15+15+15 repetitions). Maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC), 1RM, and panoramic ultrasound assessments of the triceps surae were obtained pre- as well and post-4 weeks of intervention (5 sessions per week). Results: MVIC and 1RM improved statistically from pre- to post-training ( P < 0.05), and this occurred similarly between interventions (gains of ~20% to 30%). Both regimens were similarly effective for the hypertrophy of the soleus muscle (gains of ~12% to 15%). Conversely, the lateral gastrocnemius only responded to HL-RT (gains of ~12%; P < 0.05 vs 4% with LLBFR-RT), and the medial gastrocnemius did not manifest statistical changes with either training regimen. Conclusion: HL-RT is more effective for eliciting size gains in the lateral gastrocnemius (muscle with a mixed fiber type composition) over a period of high-frequency training. The soleus (muscle with predominant oxidative fibers) adapts to both training regimens in a similar fashion. Clinical Relevance: High-frequency plantar-flexion exercise with HL-RT (5 days per week) is preferable to LLBFR-RT when aiming to elicit plantar-flexor strength gains accompanied by more comprehensive hypertrophy of the triceps surae muscle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cidrais et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: