Review evaluates AI-based markerless motion capture effectiveness for movement analysis in rehabilitation, indicating broader access and precision.
Traditional biomechanical analysis is constrained by high capital costs and the physical limitations imposed by markers, posing significant barriers to clinical adoption. This review evaluates the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI)-based markerless motion capture (MMC) as a transformative approach for democratizing movement science in clinical rehabilitation. The discussion outlines the progression from legacy geometric visual hulls to advanced deep learning architectures, with particular focus on YOLO-based two-dimensional detection and spatio-temporal transformer models for three-dimensional pose estimation. Evidence indicates that multi-camera MMC frameworks achieve research-grade positional accuracy (16–34 mm Mean Per-Joint Position Error—MPJPE), while monocular systems provide sufficient sensitivity (82–88%) for longitudinal monitoring of geriatric fall risk and stroke recovery. While challenges persist in achieving precise axial rotation measurement, integrating real-time signal refinement enables objective and ecologically valid assessments in community-based healthcare settings. This technological advancement redefines movement analysis, shifting it from a laboratory-bound procedure to a widely accessible and interoperable diagnostic tool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Georganakis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: