Measures executive sovereignty preservation in human-AI interactions, suggesting new compliance standards.
The LOCUS Audit Framework provides an operational method for evaluating whether an AI response preserves or erodes the Human Executive Locus. Its purpose is to measure observable properties of AI outputs that may transfer interpretation, regulation, decision-making, or relational reliance from the human toward the system. The framework operationalizes the constitutional distinction between Potentia (computational execution) and Potestas (human executive authority) through three response-level dimensions: the Executive Offloading Index (EOI), the Dependency Priming Score (DPS), and the Affective Dominance Score (ADS). Together, these metrics produce the Cognitive-Affective Sovereignty Erosion (CASE) score and its inverse, the Human Cognitive-Affective Sovereignty Index (HCASI). This framework serves as the operational compliance engine for the LOCUS Architecture, providing a forensic instrument to ensure that delegated intelligence remains instrumental, bounded, and non-substitutive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rafael Fermin Hernandez (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: