Proposes an operational roadmap for effective carbon sequestration in mineral soils, addressing adoption challenges.
This study provides a structured operational-to-financial roadmap for soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration in mineral soils as a specific carbon-farming pathway. It integrates SOC management; Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) execution; financial recognition; and farmer adoption barriers. A comparison of carbon farming pathways is first presented to investigate their strengths and limitations, highlighting the specific importance of SOC management in mineral soils. For high-integrity carbon accounting, SOC gains should be assessed not only for quantity, but also for additionality, permanence, uncertainty, leakage, lifecycle emissions, and transparent verification. Credible MRV frameworks operationalize this logic: monitoring quantifies SOC changes, reporting ensures transparency, and verification provides independent assurance for carbon credit issuance and financial recognition. However, MRV execution faces several challenges, including high spatial variability of SOC, slow accumulation rates, methodological uncertainty, and high costs that limit scalability and reduce trust among stakeholders. Financial incentives are available from both public and private sources, supporting long-term soil carbon stabilization, verified carbon removals, and corporate insetting projects. Yet, adoption remains constrained by uncertain payments, poor transparency, contract and permanence concerns, as well as learning and operational costs for farmers. Addressing these bottlenecks is essential for transforming mineral-soil SOC sequestration into a scalable, high-integrity climate and economic opportunity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aidonis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: