This review examines electron transfer during hydrogen production in metal/semiconductor systems, indicating key mechanistic insights.
Electron transfer at metal/oxide interfaces is central to photocatalytic hydrogen formation, yet direct mechanistic studies remain limited by the complexity of practical photocatalysts. This review summarizes experimental evidence for charge transfer and H 2 evolution in well‐defined Au/TiO 2 model systems, with emphasis on rutile TiO 2 (110) single crystals in ultrahigh‐vacuum and investigated by scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), in situ X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and online mass spectrometry. Comparison of the catalytic activity is also made with polycrystalline semiconductor photocatalysts. Observations relevant to electron transfer are highlighted. For example, XPS measurements reveal the formation of reduced Ti 3+ in TiO 2 after photocatalytic reaction, yet Au when present suppresses this route. Moreover, online mass spectrometry demonstrates that H 2 formation increases nonlinearly with Au coverage before saturation at a very low loading <0.05 monolayer equivalent. Further studies show that this is due to the effect of dispersion, where increasing the coverage hinders the reaction. The situation is more complex because pump–probe transient absorption spectroscopy results indicate that electron transfer between Au and the semiconductor occurs both ways depending on light energy. These observations establish quantitative links between three parameters needed for the design of metal/semiconductor photocatalysts: interface electronic states, cluster density and spacing, and hydrogen production kinetics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hicham Idriss (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: