Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved pressure sensitivity in piezoelectric sensors, suggesting better monitoring capabilities for fluid systems.
Piezoelectric pressure sensors for dynamic monitoring face a trade-off between charge output and measurement range, and existing high-sensitivity designs are largely confined to narrow ranges. This study presents a composite layered piezoelectric pressure sensor in which a 316L stainless-steel diaphragm drives a centrally suspended PZT-5H wafer supported by a perforated alumina gasket, with the wafer thickness and cavity radius optimized under a 10 MPa full-scale stress constraint. Over 0–10 MPa, quasi-static calibration gave a highly repeatable quadratic pressure–charge relationship (R2=0.99995) with a maximum residual below 1% FS. The sensitivity is pressure-dependent: the secant sensitivity increased monotonically from 3.16 pC/kPa at 1 MPa to 5.36 pC/kPa at 10 MPa, reflecting a stress-stiffening response rather than a measurement tolerance band. The output deviation remained within 3% from 25 °C to 150 °C. Shock-tube testing yielded a resonance of ∼50 kHz and a mutually consistent 10–90% leading-edge interval of 10.12 μs. Combining high charge sensitivity over a wide 0–10 MPa range with a fast transient response and stable operation up to 150 °C, the proposed sensor is suited to dynamic pressure-pulsation monitoring in fluid-power and thermal and power-plant fluid systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: