What question did this study set out to answer?

July 5, 2026DEN OpenOpen Access

Clinical Outcomes of Colorectal Endoscopic Full‐Thickness Resection Using the Full‐Thickness Resection Device: A Multicenter Study

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of colorectal endoscopic full-thickness resection using the full-thickness resection device.
Multicenter retrospective study across 13 centers in Australia and New Zealand
Analysis of patient demographics, lesion characteristics, procedural outcomes, R0 resection rates, and adverse events
170 EFTR procedures evaluated with a median follow-up of 5 months.
89% technical success rate achieved in EFTR procedures
Overall R0 resection rate observed was 79% with adenocarcinoma in 23% of lesions
Adverse events occurred in 16.9% of procedures, associated significantly with female sex and lesions at the appendiceal orifice.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Multicenter study evaluates adverse events and efficacy of endoscopic full-thickness resection in colorectal lesions, suggesting careful patient selection.

Cite This Study

McGarrigle et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a49f68df5d1d45b28800d72 https://doi.org/10.1002/deo2.70365

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Multicenter study evaluates adverse events and efficacy of endoscopic full-thickness resection in colorectal lesions, suggesting careful patient selection.

Clinical Outcomes of Colorectal Endoscopic Full‐Thickness Resection Using the Full‐Thickness Resection Device: A Multicenter Study

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Clinical Outcomes of Colorectal Endoscopic Full‐Thickness Resection Using the Full‐Thickness Resection Device: A Multicenter Study

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading