Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative analysis examines spiritual leadership's role in mobilizing resistance in 19th-century Java, suggesting new interpretations of socio-political dynamics.
The Java War (1825–1830) is commonly interpreted through economic grievances, colonial exploitation, and elite political contestation, while the spiritual foundations of leadership that enabled sustained mass mobilization remain insufficiently theorized. This article addresses that gap by examining the spiritual leadership of Prince Diponegoro as represented in Babad Kedung Kebo (BKK) and analyzing how religious authority functioned as a mobilizing force in nineteenth-century Java. Employing Louis W. Fry’s Spiritual Leadership Theory, the study identifies three interrelated dimensions – vision, hope/faith, and altruistic love – that generated collective spiritual well-being and reinforced commitment to resistance. Through qualitative textual analysis, it demonstrates how ascetic discipline, prophetic symbolism, and moral exemplarity transformed religious devotion into organized struggle. At the same time, the article critically interrogates the historiographical character of BKK as a performative chronicle embedded in post-war political legitimation, situating Diponegoro’s charisma at the intersection of religious experience, narrative construction, and structural crisis, including economic hardship and colonial intervention. By extending Spiritual Leadership Theory beyond contemporary organizational settings into a pre-modern Islamic anti-colonial context, this study offers a new interpretive framework for understanding the relationship between Islam, charismatic authority, and socio-political resistance in Southeast Asian history.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riyadi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: