Critical review examines herbal phytochemicals' effects on cytochrome P450 enzymes, indicating implications for drug interactions.
Cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes are the most important phase I drug-metabolizing enzymes in humans, and regulation of their activity is directly related to drug efficacy and safety. As herbal medicines gain worldwide popularity, their concurrent use with drugs has become more common. The effect of phytochemicals from herbal sources on CYP450 activity is a critical factor contributing to clinical drug interactions. When CYP450 activity is inhibited, it is easy to cause the accumulation of substrate drugs and cause toxic side effects, or the formation of toxic intermediates due to altered metabolic pathways, which seriously threaten the medication safety of patients. However, only a limited number of herbs have been evaluated for their impact on CYP450 enzyme activity, and data on the inhibitory effects of key CYP450 isoforms involved in drug metabolism remain scarce. Particularly noteworthy is the lack of research on the mechanisms of herb-drug interactions (HDIs) and the constituents of compound herbs, which impedes comprehensive identification and evaluation of potential clinical risks. This paper provides a systematic summary of CYP450 phytochemical inhibitors such as alkaloids, quinones, flavonoids, terpenoids, and coumarins in herbal medicine. In addition to the common CYP450 isoforms (e.g., CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, and CYP3A4), this review also focuses on some less frequently studied isoforms, including CYP1B1, CYP7A1, CYP8B1, CYP17A1, and CYP19A1. Through an in-depth analysis of the current research limitations, this study proposes targeted directions for technological innovation and research standardization, thereby providing a scientific basis for addressing the research gap in HDIs and herb-herb interactions (HHIs) and formulating strategies for the rational use of herbs and standards for safety evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: